Rethinking the Bering Sea Crab Collapse: Vital Dust Loss vs. Global Warming Stratification

King Crabs

The Bering Sea Crabs Lament: All We Are Is Dust In The Wind

11 Billion Bering Sea Crabs On The Amber Alert!

“A Politically Inconvenient Point of View? Replenish the dust, replenish the crabs!”

Introduction

The unprecedented collapse of the Bering Sea crab populations—especially snow crab and king crab—has prompted widespread concern. The prevailing explanation attributes this crash to warming waters and stratification, which allegedly restrict nutrient upwelling and reduce phytoplankton productivity. However, this hypothesis is based largely on modeled projections, not empirical field evidence.

In contrast, a deeper and more physically grounded mechanism points to the collapse of the once-rich Bering Sea Ice Pastures—caused by an 80% decline in the atmospheric deposition of iron-rich dust.


The Mainstream Hypothesis: Starvation Due To Ocean Warming and Stratification (almost right but not quite)

NOAA and academic institutions suggest that warmer Bering Sea surface waters lead to stronger stratification, suppressing nutrient mixing from deeper layers. This is presumed to limit phytoplankton growth, resulting in food scarcity for crab larvae and juveniles.

Yet this hypothesis depends heavily on modeled ocean dynamics. There is limited in situ data showing a significant drop in nutrients or productivity due to stratification. Critically, this narrative also ignores one of the ocean’s most powerful natural mixing mechanisms: the diel vertical migration (DVM) of marine life.


Missing: The Vertical Biological Pump

Diel vertical migration—where billions of zooplankton migrate daily up to the surface and down to deeper waters—acts as a powerful vertical mixing force, often exceeding that of winds and tides (Prairie et al., 2017). In historically abundant ecosystems like the Bering Sea, this biological pump was likely central to nutrient cycling.

When plankton populations crash, this biological pump slows, compounding nutrient loss. A downward spiral ensues: weaker mixing → lower productivity → fewer plankton → weaker DVM → further decline.


The Alternative Hypothesis: Iron Starvation and Dust Decline

Field observations support a compelling alternative cause: the collapse of aeolian dust supply from Asia, which historically enriched Bering Sea surface waters with vital iron. This dust—essential for fueling phytoplankton blooms—has declined by more than 80% since 1950 due to reforestation and industrial land use changes (Fan et al., 2004; Mahowald et al., 2010).

At the same time, diminishing sea ice has altered the capture, concentration, and release of mineral dust over seasonal melt cycles. Less ice means less dust aggregation, and earlier melting disrupts the timing and delivery of nutrients.


Chart: Dust and Fisheries Collapse

More Grass Growing = Less Dust Blowing = Fewer Fish

More Grass Growing Less Dust Blowing Chart

Decade Dust Days China        % Change N. Pacific Fishery Catch
1950s 28.2 Baseline Peak salmon/cod/sardine catches
2020s 5.7 –80% 11 Billion Bering Sea Crabs On The Amber Alert

Source: OPR Alaska


Ice and Dust Feedbacks: An Ecological Shift Too Fast

The loss of sea ice and dust is happening far faster than Bering Sea crabs can adapt. Crabs evolved over millennia to feed on blooms in ice-edge pastures, timed with the seasonal dust pulse. They cannot shift migration patterns or reproductive timing rapidly enough to track the vanishing food web.

This ecological mismatch—between rapid environmental change and slow biological adaptation—is central to understanding the crab crash.


The Practical Solution: Replenish the Dust

These insights provide a hopeful path forward. By restoring the missing dust—in the right form, in the right places, at the right time—we can revive the Bering Sea Ice Pastures. This replenishment has already been field-tested and shown to regenerate plankton blooms and higher trophic productivity, including crab recruitment.


Evidence Comparison

Mechanism Evidence Type Observations Data Gaps
Warming/
Stratification
Model-based Weak in situ data on nutrient decline and spatial impact on crabs Ignores vertical biological mixing
Iron Dust Decline Empirical Observed dust decline, satellite chlorophyll loss More ecosystem-scale restoration trials needed

Conclusion: It’s Not About Blame. It’s About Repair.

Too often, the debate over fisheries collapse becomes a finger-pointing match—fishermen vs. managers, scientists vs. politicians. But what if none of these are the true culprits?

What if the ocean is failing not only because of what we’ve taken from it… but because of what we’ve failed to give back?

Replenishing iron-rich mineral dust to revive ocean pastures offers a natural, practical, and urgently needed solution—one that science, policy, and coastal communities must now embrace.


Addendum: We Need a New Narrative

When fish disappear, we’re told it’s due to the big boogey man Climate Change/Global Warming, overfishing or poor management. But as we’ve seen, those claims catch as many fish as a lure without a hook. We are managing scarcity, not rebuilding abundance.

Let’s change that.

🔗 Read more on this at: https://opralaska.com/?p=595


References

  • Prairie, J.C., et al. (2017). Biophysical interactions in the plankton. Limnology and Oceanography: Fluids and Environments, 7, 1–24.
  • Aumont, O., et al. (2018). Ocean carbon feedbacks and iron fertilization. Nature Geoscience, 11, 709–717.
  • Fan, S.-M., et al. (2004). Atmospheric iron to the North Pacific. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 18.
  • Mahowald, N., et al. (2010). Desert dust variability. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10, 10875–10893.
  • OPR Alaska: https://opralaska.com 

The History Making/Breaking 4.25 Sigma Ocean Restoration Experiment That Brought Back The Fish

Bringing Back The Fish

In 2013, 2015, and 2017 Alaska experienced Pink Salmon returns so extraordinary that they defied all odds.
Our Native and Government Public Private Partnership project made it happen on purpose!

We are out to do it again.

2015: 190 million fish returned—an event 4.25 sigma above the norm.

In highbrow scientific terms, a 4.25 sigma result carries a greater than 99.997% confidence level. That makes it one of the most statistically significant ecological outcomes ever recorded in nature. Such events are rare in physics, and virtually unheard of in fisheries science.

This surge wasn’t random—it followed the 2012 Haida Salmon Restoration experiment, when a depleted Pink Salmon ocean pasture in the Gulf of Alaska off the islands of Haida Gwaii was replenished and restored using nature-based methods to sprinkle a small amount of vital iron-rich mineral dust to restore plankton productivity.

What followed over three return cycles of the North Pacific Pink Salmon—2013, 2015, and 2017—is the strongest real-world proof yet that we can repair the ocean and bring back life at extraordinary scale.  For comparison examination of all other ocean/salmon events in the same region produced at most a low 1.05 Sigma, statistically meaning nothing out of the ordinary!


📈 The 3-Year Results

Year Total Pink Salmon Return Sigma (Z-score) Significance
2013 224 million 2.66 σ First strong signal
2015 190 million 4.25 σ Historic
2017 145 million 2.35 σ Sustained signal

Average Sigma (2013, 2015, 2017): 3.09 σ

This corresponds to a 99.9% confidence level—a powerful confirmation that the 2012 restoration had an outstanding and reproducible impact.


🧪 What Is Sigma—and Why Does It Matter?

In science, sigma (σ) measures how far an outcome deviates from the expected average. It’s the gold standard for determining whether something truly extraordinary has occurred.

  • 1 sigma = Common, normal variation nothing to crow about
  • 2 sigma = Statistically significant (~95% confidence)
  • 3 sigma = Rare, compelling evidence (~99.7% confidence)
  • 4 sigma = Revolutionary territory
  • 5 sigma = Monumental discovery seen in experimental physics

⚛️ In Physics:

To claim discovery (like the Higgs boson), physicists demand a 5 sigma threshold. That equates to a 1 in 3.5 million chance the result is random.

🌎 In Nature:

In complex ecosystems like oceans, where climate, currents, and biology collide, 2.5 sigma events are extremely rare. A 4.25 sigma result, like our 2015 Pink Salmon return, is not just statistically powerful—it’s so historic it’s never been seen before!


🌱 A Repaired Ocean Pasture

The 2012 ocean pasture restoration triggered a bloom of plankton life that fed the entire food web:

  • More phytoplankton → more zooplankton → more salmon food
  • Juvenile salmon grew faster, survived better, and returned in higher numbers

This wasn’t due to hatchery practices. Hatchery releases were stable. River systems unchanged. Gulf of Alaska ocean conditions were normal. The only thing unusual was me and my village shipmates out to bring back the fish to the Native people who call themselves “People of the Salmon.”

And it wasn’t just the Pink Salmon that were treated to a feast to ward off their starvation, all of ocean life was nurtured, the seabirds, other species of fish, the whales…

The difference was in the ocean.


🌐 A Blueprint for Planetary Restoration

This 3-year natural experiment proves that:

  • Ocean pastures can be restored using nature’s own tools
  • Wild fish populations can recover dramatically
  • Phytoplankton blooms help draw down atmospheric CO₂

This is more than fisheries science—it’s a global climate and ecological restoration breakthrough.


📣 A Call to Action

A 4.25 sigma return is nature’s way of standing on a rooftop and shouting: “This works!”

The Haida Salmon Restoration project wasn’t just an experiment. It was a success story.
A signal.
A starting point.

We now have proof that with a little help, the ocean can recover—fast, and on a planetary scale.

Why fishermen and fisheries managers refuse to accept collapse of fisheries is not all about them!

Fewer Fish

For too long, the story of our collapsing fisheries has been told through a narrow and divisive lens.

Fishermen often see themselves as stewards of the sea, while fisheries managers see themselves as protectors through regulation. Both roles rely on a belief that their actions—harvesting or managing—are in balance with nature. But it gets worse, the public often see the fishermen as insatiable predators or pirates, and simultaneously see the fisheries managers as baffle-gabbing bureaucrats or self aggrandizing police.

When the fish disappear, we are told to look for culprits: overfishing, poor management, or illegal poachers. Fishermen point fingers at fisheries managers. Managers point back at fishermen. Environmentalists call for more restrictions. Governments commission more stock assessments. And the ocean continues to grow more silent.

But what if the true cause is neither human greed nor incompetence?

What if our oceans are no longer failing only because of what we’ve taken from them… but more importantly because of what we’ve failed to give back?

This is the uncomfortable truth that too many have resisted: the oceans have become deserts, and the collapse of fish populations is not primarily a result of overfishing or mismanagement—it is the ecological consequence of vanishing ocean pastures.

And yet, despite clear and mounting evidence, many fishermen, fisheries scientists, and regulators still resist this reality. Why?

The Land Knows What the Sea Forgets

Ask any rancher what happens when a pasture turns to dust. The livestock go hungry. We don’t blame the cows for starving. We don’t arrest the rancher for mismanaging. We see the problem for what it is: the land has gone barren.

In the ocean, we’ve forgotten this basic ecological truth. Fish are the livestock of the sea. They graze on microscopic pastures of phytoplankton, the green plants of the ocean, that bloom across vast blue prairies. But these ocean pastures—like their terrestrial cousins—require nutrients to thrive. Chief among them is iron, the tiniest trace mineral, blown from the deserts of Asia or upwelled from the deep by winter storms and sea ice.

Without vital mineral iron-rich dust, there is no pasture. Without pasture, there are no fish.

Since the 1950s, the primary source of iron to the North Pacific—the windblown dust of Central Asia—has fallen by more than 80%, as satellite and geological data now confirm. At the same time, ocean primary productivity has declined, and fish have withered in size and number. The evidence is overwhelming.

Why Are So Many Resisting the Truth About Ocean Pasture Collapse?

You might think that fishermen and fisheries managers, faced with the collapse of the very system they’ve sworn to steward, would leap at the chance to embrace the idea of ocean restoration. The science shows that replenishing ocean pastures with nature’s missing dust works. In 2012, we proved this off the coast of British Columbia in a project led with Indigenous partners: fish came roaring back. The largest salmon returns in history were recorded in the months that followed. The sea responded almost immediately to having its pastures restored.

And yet, opposition to this concept persists. Why?

1. The Pain of Admitting It Wasn’t Your Fault

Fishermen have spent decades adapting to new quotas, new gear, new rules—all in the belief that responsible fishing would save the stocks. Fisheries managers have built careers around elaborate models of sustainable yield and biomass estimates. To now admit that none of this was ever enough, because the productivity of the ocean itself has collapsed, is not just humbling—it is shattering.

But it shouldn’t be. It’s liberating.

2. The Danger of Losing Control

Science has always thrived in silos. Fisheries science is one of the most highly siloed of all, relying on its own models, assumptions, and regulatory philosophies. Introducing a new paradigm—one that requires collaboration with atmospheric chemists, ocean ecologists, and climate physicists—is perceived as a threat. A threat to control. A threat to expertise.

But the ocean doesn’t care whose model you use.

3. The Search for a Villain

Human beings are storytellers. And every good story needs a villain. In the current narrative, that villain is usually greedy fishermen, careless regulators, or foreign trawlers. But what if there is no villain?

Ocean pasture collapse is not an act of evil. It is the slow, silent erasure of vitality due to environmental change. It’s hard to rally around. It doesn’t make for a great headline. It doesn’t fit our need for justice.

The Path Forward: From Collapse to Restoration

Here’s the good news: we are not helpless. Just as ranchers reseed and water their pastures, we can restore the ocean’s productivity. The science of ocean pasture restoration is no longer speculative. It’s proven.

By restoring missing iron through carefully controlled, nature-mimicking replenishment, we can stimulate vast blooms of phytoplankton. These blooms feed the entire marine food web. They draw down carbon. They cool the planet. And they bring back the fish.

The 2012 project off Haida Gwaii, conducted in partnership with Indigenous communities and with comprehensive satellite and ecosystem monitoring, resulted in:

  • 100x increase in local phytoplankton density
  • Explosive growth of zooplankton and forage fish
  • Record-setting salmon returns across the North Pacific the following year

All from restoring less than 100 tonnes of natural mineral dust—an amount comparable to one truckload of material—over an area the size of a small county.

This is not geoengineering. This is ecological caregiving on behalf of the ocean pastures that feed us all.

Why Fishermen Should Be Leading This Revolution

Let’s be clear: this work will not succeed without fishermen. You know the ocean better than any academic or policy analyst. You’ve watched the seas go quiet. You’ve seen the fish get smaller. You know something deeper is wrong.

Now you have the opportunity to be the heroes of a new story. Not just survivors of a broken system, but stewards of a restored ocean. Imagine participating in ocean pasture restoration, watching life return to the water you work. Imagine catching bigger, healthier fish again—not because you fished less, but because the ocean was once again alive.

Why Managers and Politicians Must Embrace This

To the regulators and public officials reading this: your mandate is not just to prevent harm. It is to ensure abundance. To steward the common wealth of the ocean.

You now have the science, the precedent, and the public support to act. Ocean pasture restoration is cost-effective, scalable, and rapidly deployable. The price of inaction is collapse. The reward of action is recovery.

Time to Rewrite the Story

We don’t need more studies to prove that the fish are gone.

We don’t need another round of blame games.

What we need is courage. Courage to embrace a new understanding of ocean collapse. Courage to take action not rooted in punishment, but in restoration. Courage to admit that the ocean has been asking for help—and that we now have the tools to answer.

The story of ocean collapse doesn’t have to end in tragedy.

With your leadership, it can become a story of revival, resilience, and return.

🙏 Join Us

To the fishermen: Join us in becoming the new caretakers of the ocean pastures.

To the managers: Collaborate with us to rebuild not just stocks, but entire ecosystems.

To the public and politicians: Demand that we stop arguing over the past, and start restoring the future.

Let’s stop blaming. Let’s start restoring.

Click to read more on this in this parallel story, https://russgeorge.net/?p=21715&preview=true 

We Must Begin To Restore Bering Sea “Ice Pastures” NOW!

Missing 7 Billion Bering Sea Crabs

Bring Back The Crabs And The Salmon

Action Plan for IMMEDIATE Sustainable Replenishment of Bering Sea Aeolian Iron Dust (2025–2027 and Beyond)

The Bering Sea “Ice Pastures” have been collapsing before our eyes — neither from neglect nor the actions of some unidentified hoody “bad guy”, but from our failure to act. These “ice pastures” were once sustained by vast seasonal ice and the tiny amounts of windblown dust/iron accumulated over the long ice season. The incredible Bering Sea Ice Pastures are now starved of the iron they need torelease when the ice melts for the Bering Sea to bloom with life. In lockstep with disappearing ice, plankton have faded, its crabs have vanished by the billions, (losses of more than $200 million catch value in a single year).

Bering Sea King and Chum/Dog salmon have little left to eat, it comes at the worng time and place, and they are starving and lost at sea and not returning to their natal rivers and hence neither do the people (and dogs) of the Yukon and Kuskowhim River systems. We cannot stand by and merely allow our government to dutifully merely watch, measure, and report on tragic the death of this vital ecosystem. We must take charge — now — to restore the natural cycles that once made the Bering Sea one of the most productive marine pastures on the Blue Planet.

YK Salmon harvest now gone
Yukon Kuskowhim salmon once the mainstay of regional nutrition is no more

We know how to do it using Nature-Based ocean pasture restoration!

Purpose:
To demonstrate and prove, through rigorous scientific monitoring and responsible multi-year meso-scale series of ocean pasture replenishment and restorations, that annual Nature-based replenishment of a small, ecologically appropriate prescription of natural iron-rich dust to the Bering Sea “ice pastures” will restore and sustain primary ocean productivity at historic levels and character of health and abundance,  protect the marine food web, and dramatically help buffer ocean acidification during a time of unprecedented environmental change.


I. Background and Urgency

In 2012, the world witnessed the first large-scale demonstration of ocean pasture restoration led by Indigenous leadership and scientific collaboration — the Haida Salmon Restoration project. As Chief Scientist and project co-lead, Russ George worked with the Haida Nation over 3+ years to go though the intense review and form the public-private-partnership that included Canada’s Federal government, British Columbia’s Provincial government, and the First Nations government to develop and use nature-based methods and materials to replenish iron to a depleted North Pacific ocean pasture.

The results were a true wonder of nature and historic: within a year, Alaska experienced the largest salmon returns in recorded history, with pink salmon catches soaring to more than 225 million fish, when the forecast catch was expected to be 50 million. This success, born of ancient wisdom and modern science, proved that restoring plankton pastures is not only possible — it just works! Now, with the Bering Sea in even greater peril, the urgency to act has never been clearer.

The collapse of Bering Sea crab stocks, the disappearance of King and Chum salmon in the region, and the overall decline in marine productivity correlate with the loss of natural inputs of iron from aeolian dust and seasonal sea ice. Bering Sea dust comes from the deserts of China and Mongolia, and that vital ocean dust is today only 20% of what it was in the 1950’s. More grass growing in Asia means less dust blowing to the Bering Sea.

As sea ice diminishes, so too does its role as a collector and timed delivery system for iron to ocean pastures. Today, the Bering Sea remains ice-free for most of the year, and ocean acidification and iron starvation is a growing ecological crisis.

Restoring even a modest, nature-mimicking fraction of the iron that once arrived with seasonal dust and sea ice can reawaken the ocean pastures that support marine life from plankton to people.

Sea Ice bloom ecology
Sea Ice is a vital micronutrient supply for Bering Sea Ice Pastures, as the sea ice disappears the pastures are in trouble

II. Objectives (2025–2027 and Beyond)

  1. Prove feasibility at real world functioning ecological scale the effectiveness of targeted, annual nature-based iron replenishment in the Bering Sea.
  2. Quantify ecological responses at all trophic levels, from phytoplankton to commercial and vital cultural species of fish and sealife.
  3. Demonstrate safety, transparency, and economic viability of the replenishment and restoration works.
  4. Build scientific consensus and public trust to support expanded action post-2027.

III. Implementation Timeline

Year 1 (2025): Pilot Deployment and Baseline Science

  • Select 1–2 target Bering Sea Ice pastures (~10,000 km² – 50,000km² each) based on historic productivity and ecological need.
  • Apply ~100 tonnes of nature-based iron-rich dust per pasture via environmentally safe and simple methods we have proven works.
  • Deploy myriad scientific instruments: ships, buoys, drones, satellite sensors, and AUVs for tracking.
  • Establish biological and chemical baselines (chlorophyll, pH, dissolved CO₂, +++,  zooplankton, crab and salmon returns).
  • Engage local Indigenous and fishing communities in field observation and co-management.

Year 2 (2026): Expansion and Replication

  • Expand to 3+ pastures, repeating successful Year 1 methods.
  • Increase spatial and temporal resolution of monitoring.
  • Begin multi-trophic level ecosystem modeling.
  • Host first international field symposium on ocean iron replenishment in the Arctic.

Year 3 (2027): Validation and Policy Acceleration

  • Continue with additional pasture replenishment and restorations work.
  • Compile 3-year synthesis of biological recovery and biological flux data
  • Publish peer-reviewed scientific papers and open-source datasets.
  • Launch policy advocacy campaign urging permanent replenishment operations with global climate benefits.

IV. Operational Framework

  • Material Source: Naturally sourced, finely powdered iron mineral dust matching the geochemical signature of historic Asian dust.
  • Delivery Method: Cpontrolled ship based delivery of the prescribed dust.
  • Oversight: Managed by our world class leadership in ocean pasture restoration business and science with public reporting and external audits.
  • Governance: Operate under appropriate Federal and State law.

V. Expected Outcomes

This initiative is guided by the understanding that we must move from passive observation to active nature-based replenishment and eco-restoration. As we launch and refine this vital work we also set a precedent for long-term care — a stewardship model in which we, as beneficiaries of ocean life, assume the responsibility to give back. Restoring a fraction of the natural iron cycle is not only possible but necessary to help the ocean endure in a rapidly changing climate.

  • Measurable increases in chlorophyll-a and plankton productivity.
  • Recovery signals in crab larvae, forage fish, and seabird populations.
  • Stabilization of ocean pH in treatment zones.
  • Model validation showing alignment with historic productivity patterns.
  • Foundation for long-term ocean restoration funding.

VI. Conclusion

This multi-year action plan is a commitment to do more than just observe decline, and to establish a sustainable model for ongoing ocean stewardship beyond 2027. It is a call to give back to the Bering Sea — not with foreign chemicals or speculative geoengineering, but with a humble helping of the same dust it once received from the wind and ice. We must act now, decisively and wisely, to sustain life in the Bering Sea while we still can.


Social Media Snippets & Hashtags

Help amplify the message and build momentum for ocean restoration. Use and share these:

Hashtags:
#OceanRestoration #BeringSea #IronForLife #OceanPastures #ClimateAction #CrabCollapse #DustToLife #RestoreOurSeas

Snippets:

  • “The Bering Sea is starving — not from overfishing, but from iron deficiency. We’re restoring the missing link. #OceanRestoration #IronForLife”
  • “Crabs can’t survive without plankton. Plankton can’t grow without iron. The sea once gave it freely — now we must give back. #RestoreOurSeas”
  • “Nature once fed the ocean with dust carried by wind and ice. We’re bringing it back, responsibly and scientifically. #DustToLife #BeringSea”
  • “It’s time to stop just monitoring ocean collapse and start healing it. Replenish iron, restore life. #CrabCollapse #ClimateAction”
  • “This is not geoengineering. It’s ecological stewardship. The Bering Sea needs iron — and we know how to deliver it. #OceanPastures #IronMatters”

Alaska Pollock: Half a Century of Change in Size, Sustainability, and Salmon Bycatch

Alaska Pollock

The Shrinking Giants: How Alaska Pollock Size Has Declined Over 75 Years—and What We Can Do About It

Alaska Pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus), one of the world’s most commercially important fish, has been shrinking for decades. Once hailed as a cornerstone species feeding the world, Pollock are now smaller, lighter, and delivering less value per fish. The causes? Overfishing, warming waters, declining ocean pastures, and ecological stress. But there is a clear path forward—and it begins with restoring the ocean itself.


Why Pollock Size Matters

Smaller Pollock mean:

  • Fewer fillets per fish
  • Less economic value per ton landed
  • Reduced reproductive capacity
  • Greater energy costs for processing
  • Ecological ripple effects throughout the marine food chain

This decline is driven by the Collapse of ocean pasture productivity, caused by the long-term loss of iron-rich dust that once fertilized vast plankton blooms. Read more about on Understanding The Cause Of Ocean Fisheries Collapse Is The First Step at this link. https://opralaska.com/?p=526 

The fishing and seafood processing industries have raised alarm over this size reduction. Research from NOAA Fisheries and the North Pacific Fisheries Management Council (NPFMC) shows that Alaska Pollock in the Bering Sea are now maturing at smaller sizes, likely due to warming seas and food scarcity. This is not just a biological concern—it’s an industrial problem.

“A smaller pollock isn’t just shorter—it’s poorer. Less flesh, less value, more boats chasing more bony fish.”
— OPR Alaska Editorial


Processing Crisis: Smaller Fish, Bigger Headaches

Seafood processors are feeling the strain:

  • Filleting and deboning equipment, designed for larger fish, is experiencing increased “fall-through” rates.
  • Smaller fish yield lower-quality and lower-volume fillets, while increasing waste and labor costs.
  • Industry leaders such as Trident Seafoods have reported substantial profit erosion due to these inefficiencies.

Trade publications like Undercurrent News and National Fisherman confirm that these trends are driving up per-pound costs and undermining the economics of the fishery.

These industrial bottlenecks are not unique to Pollock. A similar scenario is playing out with Atlantic cod, where studies like Björnsson et al. (2017) show that smaller cod reduce processing efficiency. Scientific work by Helser et al. (2019) and Barbeaux et al. (2020) further supports these findings, directly linking shrinking fish size to climate-driven ecological shifts.

Unless fishing practices and processing technologies adapt—or ocean conditions improve—the continued reduction in fish size may jeopardize the economic viability of the Pollock and cod fisheries alike.


Quantifying the Decline: A 75-Year Trend

Alaska Pollock stocks, managed independently by the U.S., Russia, and Japan, all show the same alarming trend: shrinking fish.

Decade Avg. Length (cm) – U.S. Avg. Weight (kg) – Russia Avg. Length (cm) – Japan
1950s 55 1.4 60
1970s 52 1.2 57
1990s 49 1.0 52
2010s 45 0.8 48
2020s 44 0.7 47

Sources: NOAA (U.S.), Funk & Hobbs (2018) (Russia), Japan Fisheries Agency (Japan)


Price Collapse: Quantity Over Quality

Although catch volumes have remained relatively stable—averaging 1.26 million metric tons annually since 1979 in the U.S.—the value per ton has fallen sharply.

“The average price for the decade ending in 2020 was about $1.28 per pound—roughly half of what Pollock fetched in the 1980s when adjusted for inflation.”
— Craig Medred, craigmedred.news

Smaller fish simply don’t pay. The combination of reduced yield, higher labor and maintenance costs, and reduced throughput efficiency means declining profitability per fish, even when total catch volumes remain high.

Let’s look at the added value proposition

If ocean restoration brings Pollock back to historic size and weight, the data clearly shows the decline in weight from the 1950’s is 50%.  Restoring Alaska pollock to their historic size could triple the value of the fishery—even without catching more fish—just by getting more and better meat from each fish.

Let’s run a quick model:

Metric Today’s Fish (~1 lb) Restored Fish (~2 lbs)
Meat yield 35% 50%
Meat per fish 0.35 lb 1.0 lb
Value per pound (avg fillet) $2.50 $2.75
Value per fish ~$0.88 ~$2.75
Value multiplier 3.1x

Now just do the value math!

  • Annual catch: 1.3 million metric tons = ~2.87 billion pounds.

  • Doubling weight at 3.1x value per fish → Potential added value: $6–9 billion per year.

 


Bycatch of King Salmon: A Collateral Crisis

The Alaska Pollock trawl fleet is also at the center of an ecological flashpoint: the unintentional capture of endangered Chinook (King) salmon.

  • In 2024, the Gulf of Alaska Pollock fishery was shut down early after two Kodiak-based vessels caught 2,000 King salmon, pushing the fishery near its legal limit of 18,000.
  • Bering Sea fleets face similar caps and incentive-based bycatch reduction strategies, but conflicts with subsistence salmon needs are intensifying.

“In 2024, the Gulf of Alaska pollock fishery faced an early closure after two Kodiak-based trawlers inadvertently caught approximately 2,000 king salmon.”
— Northern Journal

This bycatch issue further highlights the tension between industrial efficiency and ecological responsibility—a balance that ocean conditions are rapidly tipping out of favor.


Root Cause: The Collapse of Ocean Pastures

Beneath all of this—shrinking fish, falling profits, bycatch crises—is a foundational environmental truth: the collapse of North Pacific plankton productivity.

Since the 1950s, the vital flow of iron-rich mineral dust from Asia has plummeted. Once carried by seasonal winds to fertilize ocean pastures, this dust sustained vast blooms of phytoplankton—the very base of the marine food web.

Without it:

  • Zooplankton collapse.
  • Forage fish go hungry.
  • Pollock and salmon shrink.

The Solution: Ocean Pasture Restoration

There is a proven way to restore ocean productivity—replenishing missing iron to revive natural plankton blooms.

“With ocean pasture restoration, we will bring back the plankton blooms that once made the North Pacific the most productive fishing ground on Earth.”
— OPR Alaska

This nature-based solution mimics what the wind once did naturally: delivering small amounts of bioavailable iron into high-nutrient, low-chlorophyll (HNLC) ocean regions. The results are:

  • Bigger, faster-growing Pollock with more marketable meat
  • Stronger, healthier King salmon, better equipped to survive and reproduce
  • More food for every link in the oceanic food web
  • A rapid rebound in salmon smolt survival, ensuring multi-year population recovery

“Ocean pasture restoration is not just about saving fish—it’s about saving the future of coastal communities, Indigenous livelihoods, and marine biodiversity.”

The ocean responds within weeks. Plankton blooms return. Fish get fatter. Ecosystems rebound. We’ve seen it before. We can do it again—at scale.


A Call to Action

We cannot manage our way out of starvation. We must restore abundance.

Ocean pasture restoration is ready for deployment. The science is sound. The cost is low. The benefit is immense.

Let us act now—to rebuild the North Pacific’s ocean pastures, put premium pounds back on our Pollock, and ensure that King salmon return in strength, not as a memory.

Let’s restore our ocean pastures—
for Pollock, for salmon, for the future.


Sources & Further Reading

When the Ocean Turned Against the Crabs

Bering Sea Crab Mystery

How Alaska NOAA Head Dr. Robert Foy’s Warning Became a Grim Reality

Spoiler Alert: We Can Bring Back The Crabs!

🌊 Introduction

In the frigid, storm-lashed waters of the Bering Sea, snow and king crabs once supported one of the most productive and valuable fisheries on Earth. For generations, these creatures thrived in a delicate balance of cold temperatures, rich nutrients, and healthy ocean ecosystems.

But beneath the surface, subtle shifts were already unraveling that balance—long before anyone could see the collapse coming.


🔬 The Science Was Clear—And Ignored

“In lower pH environments, juvenile crabs experienced stunted growth, reduced survival, and impaired physiology.” — NOAA Laboratory Findings, early 2010s

More than a decade ago, Dr. Robert Foy and his team at NOAA began sounding the alarm. Their masterful experiments showed without question that ocean acidification—caused by the ocean’s absorption of rising atmospheric CO₂—was disrupting crab development at the most vulnerable stages of life. Blue and red king crab larvae showed poor survival in these ever so slightly more acidic waters.

These findings were not speculative. By the early 2010s, Foy’s team warned that the Bering Sea could begin tipping into crisis by the 2020s.

And then it did.

Between 2018 and 2021, the snow crab population plummeted by over 80%, decreasing from 11.7 billion to 1.9 billion crabs. This sharp decline was primarily attributed to a marine heatwave in 2018–2019, which led to habitat loss, increased metabolic stress, and starvation among the crabs.

2021–2022: Economic Impact Intensifies

In 2021, snow crab numbers crashed—more than a billion crabs simply vanished. The Alaska Department of Fish and Game took the unprecedented step of closing the snow crab fishery for the 2022 season.

The 2021–2022 season had seen a 47% decrease in the value of crab harvested under the Crab Rationalization Program, amounting to a loss of $102.4 million. This downturn was mainly due to significant reductions in the total allowable catch for both Bering Sea snow crab and Bristol Bay red king crab fisheries.Sustainable Fisheries UW+2NOAA Fisheries+2Alaska Beacon+2

2022–2023: Unprecedented Fishery Closures

In a historic move, Alaska canceled the snow crab season for the first time ever in 2022–2023, following an 87% drop in population from 8 billion in 2018 to 1 billion in 2021. The red king crab fishery also remained closed for the second consecutive year. These closures resulted in a 100% revenue loss for the snow crab fishery, equating to approximately $133 million in ex-vessel value and $171 million in wholesale revenue.


🧊 A Fishery Vanishes But It Was No Mystery

The headlines focused on warming seas and marine heatwaves—but scientists quietly pointed to acidification as an invisible, but no less deadly, co-driver.


🌱 Plankton: The Ocean’s First Line of Defense

“The collapse of crab populations wasn’t just a simple chemical reaction; it was a cascading failure of the ocean’s ecological foundation.”

Ocean acidification is more than a chemical issue—it’s an ecological systems crisis. And the system starts with plankton.

Phytoplankton, the tiny photosynthetic organisms that fuel the entire marine food web, also regulate carbon. Healthy plankton pastures remove CO₂ from both water and air, helping maintain ocean pH. But warming, pollution, and loss of nutrients are killing these critical plankton blooms.

Without these vibrant pastures, the ocean loses its ability to resist acidification—and marine life from crabs to whales feels the effect.


🤫 What Happened to Dr. Foy’s Message?

Ironically, today Dr. Robert Foy is the Director of NOAA’s Alaska Fisheries Science Center. But his public statements no longer feature his landmark work on acidification and crabs and his near perfect prophecy of their doom.

Instead, NOAA’s narrative has shifted to a vague “climate change” ocean “warm blob” explanation, obscuring the clear, testable cause-and-effect chain that Foy once helped reveal. When scientist Foy let the data do the talking the doomsday scenario the crabs face is clear, when bureaucrat boss Foy does the talking its a different story.

“Blaming climate change in general avoids responsibility. Restoring ocean biology—especially plankton pastures—is our last and best defense.”


🌍 The Science Is In: We Have the Knowledge and the Means to Restore Ocean Pastures Now

“Like turning off a nutrient tap, the slowing dust storms of the late 20th century left entire ocean basins gasping for vital iron.” — Martinez-Garcia, Nature (2011)

The catastrophic collapse of the Bering Sea’s crab populations wasn’t just a coincidence of warming waters and “climate change.” It was the predictable result of a decades-long decline in vital aeolian (wind-blown) dust—and with it, the loss of iron that once nourished the North Pacific’s ocean pastures.

Read this post  “Understanding the cause of ocean and fisheries collapse” https://opralaska.com/?p=526

Ocean Pasture Restoration Now

We simply cannot do any form of chemistry to neutralize oceans growing acidic content, there are not the billions of tons of  antacid tums tablets to cure Mother Oceans heartburn,  similarly we simply cannot staunch the flow of humanities fossil-fueled CO2 into the air and ocean in the immediate time frame that the dying acidic ocean needs YESTERDAY!

What we can do using proven nature-based methods, immediately replenish and restore the vital ocean pastures and in doing so restore the natural health, abundance, and resiliance of our Bering Sea ocean pastures.

Starting in the 1950s and accelerating through the 1960s, Asian dust storms declined by over 80%, driven largely by rising atmospheric CO₂ fertilizing grasslands in China and Central Asia. With more grass came less dust. And with less dust came starving plankton, collapsing fish stocks, and ocean deserts where once there were life-rich seas.

“Sardines didn’t vanish because we fished too hard—they vanished because we didn’t notice their pasture was dying beneath them.” — Chavez, Progress in Oceanography (2003)

For more than 35 years, hundreds of millions of dollars have been invested in public and private ocean iron replenishment research, including major field trials from the U.S., Japan, Canada, Germany, the EU, and independent organizations. These studies have proven again and again that replenishing just a few tonnes of iron-rich dust can restore plankton blooms across tens of thousands of square kilometers of ocean, reviving the marine food web from the bottom up.

This is not speculative science—it’s tested, measurable, and ready for deployment. And most importantly, it is nature-based. We aren’t inventing something new—we’re simply restoring the natural mineral cycle that human activity interrupted.

By reintroducing trace mineral dust into these barren ocean regions, we can immediately restore the plankton pastures that once supported massive populations of crabs, salmon, cod, sardines, and the seabirds and whales that fed on them.

Ocean pasture restoration is the most practical, fast-acting, and scalable tool we have to reverse marine ecosystem collapse and remove legacy atmospheric CO₂.


🐟 The Failure of Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) and the Need for Ocean Pasture Management

Historically, fisheries management has focused on maximum allowable catch, relying on the flawed model of Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY). This approach fails to consider the declining productivity of ocean ecosystems and has led to devastating overharvesting even as marine habitats wither.

“Managing fisheries without managing their pastures is like raising cattle while ignoring the grasslands.” — Ware & Thomson, Science (2005)

Today, as multiple fisheries collapse, we must replace MSY with Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management (EBFM)—a model that prioritizes the health of the ocean pastures themselves.

By restoring ocean productivity through nature-based iron replenishment, we can rebuild marine food webs, sustain biodiversity, and ensure long-term resilience. This approach mirrors successful terrestrial pasture management, which focuses not on maximum extraction but on maintaining the carrying capacity of the land.

It’s time ocean management caught up.


✅ What Must Be Done – WE CAN BRING BACK THE CRABS

  • Declare an Ocean and Fisheries Emergency at local, state, and national levels so that we can respond to this true emergency with redirection of existing resources immediately and not via some endless legislative and academic debating exercise in moving through a quagmire.  Read more on this emergency at this link https://opralaska.com/?p=504
  • Restore plankton pastures through proven targeted replenishment of Mother Nature’s missing mineral dust
  • Recognize ocean acidification and dust decline  as a primary, reversible drivers of marine collapse
  • Move beyond MSY toward full ecosystem and habitat-based marine management
  • Deploy ready-to-scale ocean iron replenishment, proven over decades of international study

📚 References & Further Reading

  • Hurst, T.P. et al. (2012). Effects of ocean acidification on juvenile red king and Tanner crab. PLOS ONE.
  • Martin, J.H. (1990). Glacial-interglacial CO₂ change: The iron hypothesis. Paleoceanography.
  • Martinez-Garcia et al. (2011). Dust-climate coupling in glacial North Pacific. Nature.
  • Boyd et al. (2007). Mesoscale Iron Enrichment Experiments. Science.
  • Moore et al. (2013). Natural iron fertilization is not enough. Nature Geoscience.
  • Chavez et al. (2003). Sardine collapse and the plankton connection. Progress in Oceanography.
  • George, R. (2014). Pacific Carbon Restoration.
  • KMXT.org (2024). Alaska organization wants to renew ocean pastures

📣 Share This Post

“It’s not just about emissions—it’s about the missing plankton, the unraveling food web, and the silent acidification of the seas.”

Use hashtags:
#OceanRestoration #CrabCollapse #PlanktonPastures #BringBackTheCrabs #NatureBasedSolutions #DustMatters

Understanding The Cause Of Ocean Fisheries Collapse Is The First Step

Dust stomrs disappearing means oceans become deserts

The next step is restoring our ocean pastures!

I did an AI search on the decline of dust blowing across the Pacific from China and Asia and the decline began in the 1950-1960 time frame, the 1960’s had only a fraction of the dust of the 50’s. References cite the increased growth of Asian grasses due to rising CO2 as being responsible.

So it’s all there in the scientific data, the great dying of the North Pacific Ocean fish pastures began with the industrial boom that followed WW2 spewing massive amounts of CO2 into the air, growing grass in the Asian dustbowls , and turning the North Pacific into a clear blue desert.

“Like turning off a nutrient tap, the slowing dust storms of the late 20th century left entire ocean basins gasping for vital iron.” — Martinez-Garcia, Nature (2011)

More Grass Growing Means Less Dust Blowing And Fish Disappearing

Decade Dust Days China %Change N. Pacific Iron (μM) Key Events
1950’s 28.2 Baseline 0.12 Peak Salmon/ Cod/Sardine Catches
2020’s 5.7 – 80% 0.04 Multiple fishery closures

Data sources: Zhang 2016 (Atmos. Chem. Phys.), EMEP 2021

Ocean Pasture Productivity and Fish decline 1950-2010

Sources: Boyce et al. (2010), FAO Fisheries Reports (2021), Wong et al. (2020)

Lost in translation

“The ocean’s pastures are starving. While the world focused on overfishing, we failed to notice the dust famine that quietly undermined the entire marine food web.” — Boyd et al., Nature (2007)

“Sardines didn’t vanish because we fished too hard—they vanished because we didn’t notice their pasture was dying beneath them.” — Chavez, Progress in Oceanography (2003)

“Even if emissions halted tomorrow, the ocean’s iron debt would take centuries to repay through natural processes alone.” — Moore et al., Nature Geoscience (2013)

“Managing fisheries without managing their pastures is like raising cattle while ignoring the grasslands.” — Ware & Thomson, Science (2005)

“For less than the cost of one offshore wind farm, we could replenish all the North Pacific’s missing iron—and Bring Back Its Fish.” — George, Pacific Carbon Restoration (2014)

“The geo-engineering experiment has already been run—we removed the iron, and the fish disappeared. Now we must reverse the trial.” — Martin, Nature (2013)

What to do to Bring Back The Fish

There is only one hope for our oceans and our fish, that is replenishing the dust to our oceans which we have ground beneath our industrial heels, doing so will immediately restore the oceans to their historic levels of health and abundance, and bring back the fish and all of ocean life.

New Fisheries and Ocean Pasture Management Policies Are Vital

Fisheries management has traditionally prioritized maximizing allowable catch, often through the concept of Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY). This approach focuses only to harvest the largest possible quantity of fish without overharvesting the stock, but it has faced significant criticism for neglecting broader ecosystem health and the declining productivity of ocean pastures.

Critique of Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY):

MSY has been a cornerstone of fisheries management, focusing on the highest catch that can be taken from a fish stock over an indefinite period. However, this method has been challenged for its oversimplification and potential to lead to overfishing. Sidney Holt, a notable fisheries scientist, referred to MSY as “the worst idea in fisheries management” due to its potential to severely depress fish populations if pursued aggressively.ResearchGate

Furthermore, MSY often fails to account for the complex interactions within marine ecosystems, such as especially habitat dependencies and predator-prey relationships. This “blinders on” focus results in management decisions that overlook the broader ecological consequences of fishing practices.

Shifting Baselines and Goalposts:

The concept of “shifting baselines” describes how each generation perceives the current state of the environment as the norm, often unaware of historical abundances. In fisheries, this has led to the gradual and automatic acceptance of declining fish populations as normal, with management allowable catch targets adjusted over time to accommodate reduced stocks. This incremental moving of the goalposts masks the true extent of ecological degradation and prohibits restoration of marine ecosystems to their former levels of health and productivity.

Ocean Pasture Based Fisheries Management:

In response to the limitations of MSY, there has been a growing advocacy for Ocean pasture based (Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management – EBFM). EBFM is an approach that considers the entire ecosystem, including environmental variables, habitat conditions, and species interactions, rather than focusing solely on target fish stocks. The goal is to maintain ecosystems in a healthy, productive, and resilient condition so they can provide the services humans want and need.

Implementing Ocean Pasture restoration and management will immediately address the decline in ocean productivity and carrying capacity by integrating as a managment priority habitat health, biodiversity, and the impacts of environmental changes. This approach contrasts with traditional methods that prioritize maximum catch without adequately accounting for ecosystem sustainability.

Comparisons to Terrestrial Management:

Fisheries and ocean pasture management has proceeded in a fashing unlike and indeed in opposition to traditional terrestrial pasture management, which aims to optimize the carrying capacity of the land to sustain livestock populations. Traditional fisheries management has focused exclusively on extraction rates as opposed to the health and productivity of ocean pasture habitats. This disparity highlights the need for a paradigm shift in how marine resources are managed, emphasizing the restoration and maintenance of ocean pastures to support sustainable fish populations.

Conclusion:

The historical emphasis on maximum allowable catch in fisheries management has contributed to the massive decline of fish populations and the degradation of marine ecosystems. Adopting ecosystem-based approaches that consider the health of ocean pastures and their carrying capacity is crucial for the sustainable management of global fisheries. This shift requires moving beyond the narrow focus of maximum allowable catch to embrace strategies that ensure the long-term productivity and resilience of marine environments.

Alaska’s Fishery Must Be Declared A National Emergency

Declare A National Emergency

Public Appeal to Save Alaska’s Ocean Pastures and Restore America’s Seafood Future

Fellow Alaskans  and Americans,

Our nation faces a silent crisis on its last frontier—one that threatens not only the health of our oceans but also the livelihoods of tens of thousands of Americans and the future of our seafood industry. The oceans of Alaska, which produce more than 60% of the nation’s seafood, are in dire straits. The collapse of its ocean pastures—the foundation of the marine food web—has led to a devastating decline in marine life and fisheries catch.

NOAA Fisheries Crisis report 2024Last fall NOAA reported another, repeating, annual $1.8 billion loss in the Alaska catch, which NOAA conservatively translates into a staggering $4.3 billion blow to the U.S. seafood economy. They add that the crisis has also cost the nation 38,000 jobs. Together these are a clear warning sign of deeper industry, economic, and ecological collapse.

The root cause? It’s not a subject of debate!

It is the collapse of primary ocean productivity. Plankton, the microscopic plants that form the base of the marine food chain, are vanishing. These ocean pastures are the lifeblood of Alaska’s fisheries, and America’s fisheries, supporting everything from salmon to crab to the iconic Alaskan pollock. Without healthy ocean plankton pastures, there can be no healthy fish and marine life populations—and without fish and marine life, there can be no seafood industry.

This collapse of the ocean plankton pastures has been the subject of 50 years of ocean science research and the result of that research is that we have proven we have the means to immediately replenish and restore those pastures and their fish to historic levels of health and abundance.

This Crisis Extends Beyond Alaska

While Alaska’s ocean emergency is the most urgent, it is not an isolated problem. Across the United States, our oceans have been and are suffering from similar collapses in productivity, with devastating consequences for fisheries, coastal communities, and our national economy.

  • Atlantic Coast: Twenty-five years ago, the collapse of ocean pastures led to the decline of Atlantic Salmon, pushing this iconic species onto the endangered species list. Once a thriving commercial fishery, the Atlantic Salmon diminised, starving at sea on degraded ocean pastures, leaving New England’s fishing communities struggling and its ecosystems in chaos.
  • Pacific Coast: Los Angeles, whose flag proudly features a tuna fish, lost its massive tuna fishing industry in the 1950s due to the collapse of ocean pastures. The disappearance of this vital ocean ecosystems not only ended an era of prosperity, this also served as an early warning sign of the broader crisis we face today.

These examples underscore a troubling truth: the collapse of ocean pastures is a nationwide emergency. What is happening in Alaska today will soon become the reality for other regions if we continue to fail to act. The time to restore America’s oceans is now.

Despite the alarming evidence of economic and ecological collapse, no government agency has deigned to take decisive action to restore these vital ocean pastures. The time for academic fisheries, “fiddling while Rome burns”, merely observing, silence, and inaction, is over. We are out of time and need bold leadership and immediate emergency intervention to reverse this crisis.

What Must Be Done:

  1. Declare a National Emergency: The collapse of Alaska’s ocean pastures is not just an Alaskan problem—it is an American crisis. We call on the President and federal leaders to declare a national ocean and fisheries emergency and to immediately mobilize resources and proven methods to mitigate this catastrophe. We call on the people of Alaska to demand this action now!
  2. Revise Federal Priorities to Address the Crisis: In other emergencies, such as oil spills, hurricanes, or massive forest fires, the federal government immediately revises priorities across multiple agencies to muster teams and resources to mitigate the damage. This is standard practice—and it’s exactly what’s needed now. NOAA’s Alaska vessel fleet and laboratories must be redirected to begin ocean restoration efforts immediately. These resources, already in place, can be deployed to restore the natural mineral dust that plankton need to thrive, jumpstarting the recovery of Alaska’s ocean pastures.
  3. Support Proven Solutions: OPR Alaska, a company dedicated to ocean restoration, has spent years developing and advocating for methods to restore ocean productivity. Our work has shown that replenishing vital minerals can revive plankton pastures and, in turn, restore fish populations. This is not theoretical—it is proven science. Federal action to deploy this work now is critical.
  4. Protect Jobs and Communities: The collapse of Alaska’s fisheries is not just an environmental issue—it is an economic and social crisis. By restoring ocean pastures, we can  restore and save jobs, protect coastal communities, and ensure that America’s seafood industry remains a global leader. The expected results of this emergency action are clear: the immediate return of more than 38,000 seafood industry jobs and the restoration of more than $4 billion in economic prosperity to America.

Why This Matters:

For Our Economy: The seafood industry is a cornerstone of America’s economy, providing jobs, feeding families, and supporting countless businesses. Alaska’s fisheries alone contribute billions of dollars annually. Without action, the real time catastrophic losses will only grow.

For Our Food Security: Seafood is a vital source of protein for millions of Americans. The collapse of Alaska’s fisheries threatens our nation’s food security and could lead to higher prices and shortages.

For Our Environment: Healthy oceans are essential to the health of our planet. Restoring ocean pastures will not only revive fish populations but also help combat climate change by increasing the ocean’s ability to repurpose carbon dioxide into fish!

We Cannot Wait:

The collapse of Alaska’s ocean pastures is a crisis that demands immediate action. Just as the federal government responds swiftly to oil spills and forest fires, hurricanes it must now act with urgency to address this ocean and fisheries emergency. We call on every American to join us in urging our leaders to take decisive steps to restore these vital ecosystems.

Contact your representatives, share this message, and demand that the federal government prioritize ocean restoration. Together, we can save Alaska’s oceans, protect our seafood industry, and secure a sustainable future for generations to come.

The time to act is now. Our oceans, our jobs, and our future depend on it.

If you are inclned to action

You  may reserved seats on our ships voyage of recovery. Sign aboard, lend a hand and bend your back and it’ll be as if you have dipped yourself in magic waters.

The one constant through all the years, has been the ocean.

Throughout the ages the land has been erased like a blackboard, rebuilt, and erased again.

But the ocean has marked the time.

It’s a part of our past and our future and reminds us of all that once was good, and it could be again. It’s time to for us to take action and make it that way.

#SaveAlaskasOceans #RestoreOurFisheries #OceanRestorationNow

Kodiak KMXT Radio Report On Ocean Restoration

Reviving Alaska’s Ocean Pastures: A Bold Step Toward Marine Restoration

Ocean Pasture Restoration (OPR) Alaska is spearheading a pioneering initiative aimed at rejuvenating marine ecosystems in the Gulf of Alaska. Set to commence in 2025, this three-year pilot project focuses on enhancing phytoplankton production—the foundational element of oceanic food webs.

The strategy involves the careful introduction of iron-rich mineral dust into specific ocean regions. This method is designed to stimulate phytoplankton growth, thereby supporting the broader marine food chain. The concept draws inspiration from the work of oceanographer John Martin, who emphasized the critical role of iron in phytoplankton proliferation.

Rob Lindsey, a seasoned commercial fisherman from Kodiak, and Ted Crookston, a member of OPR’s Fisheries Advisory Board, are leading advocates for the project. They express concerns about the sustainability of commercial fishing, particularly for species like king salmon, if proactive measures aren’t taken. Their vision includes establishing Kodiak as the central hub for operations, potentially extending efforts down to the Canadian border and into the Bering Sea.

OPR Alaska has previously experimented with this approach, notably in 2012, observing anecdotal increases in salmon returns in subsequent years. However, the organization acknowledges the need for more comprehensive data and is seeking support from state legislators to ensure transparency and engagement.

For a detailed account of this initiative, refer to the original article by Davis Hovey on KMXThttps://www.kmxt.org/news/2024-12-02/alaska-organization-wants-to-renew-ocean-pastures-and-boost-production-of-phytoplankton 

Stay tuned to OPRAlaska.com for ongoing updates on this significant endeavor to restore Alaska’s ocean pastures and bolster marine life.

OPR Alaska Testimony To Alaska Senate Resource Committee

Alaska’s top resource managers are briefed on the hope and promise of ocean pasture restoration that will tackle the CRISIS of both fisheries collapse and climate change.

Alaska State Senators hope to see OPR Alaska Bring Back The Fish, again!

Our company was delighted to have the opportunity to testify to the Alaska Senators on Monday. Founder Russ George reported on our business plan to begin a 3-year commercial-scale demonstration project on ocean pasture restoration (OPR) in the Gulf of Alaska. We’re confident this R&D phase of our business will deliver definitive data to prove that ocean pasture restoration is safe, sustainable both ecologically and financially, and is the World’s best hope to restore both fisheries and climate.

President Biden signs order
President Biden orders fisheries and climate restoration. Click to read

President Biden has acted to show that the restoration of fisheries and climate is amongst his, and the nations’, highest priorities. One of his first actions in office was to sign an executive order on January 27th commanding federal and state government agencies ‘to deliver working solutions to save fisheries and restore the climate within 60 days.’

OPR Alaska is seeking to engage in a partnership with the State of Alaska to offer our private sector for-profit OPR ‘shovel-ready’ business plan to President Biden’s ‘executive order’. We will deliver the results commanded, better, faster, and cheaper including protecting the jobs of tens of thousands of Alaskans in the fishing industry while generating hundreds of millions in additional revenues in the state.

This video of the Alaska Senate Resource Committee has an introduction by Ted Crookston, an Alaskan commercial fisherman from Kenai – his family is 4 generations of Alaska fishermen.

Alaska has the most important ocean pastures

Alaska_60%Alaska holds the distinction of representing 61% of the entire USA fishing industry. Nearly 70,000 Alaskans depend on fish for their livelihoods. Their work delivers $5.6 billion dollars into the state economy each year.  But Alaska’s fish have been in dire straits, especially the iconic salmon, which have been mysteriously disappearing in the Gulf of Alaska.

Ocean Pasture Restoration isn’t new, there is a 30-year history of research and development of OPR by the international ocean science and climate change community. Hundreds of millions of dollars of public and private funds have been invested over the decades in many OPR experiments performed by consortia of ocean science groups around the world.

John Martin NASA page
The late John Martin, father of OPR, NASA’s memorial page – Click to read

As a result of these decades of directed R&D, OPR technology and methodology is recognized as a proven ‘nature-based’ means to reverse the 70-year collapse of ocean pasture ecosystems. That collapse, which is the most immediate and dire part of global climate change, has contributed to the disappearance of salmon in the North Pacific, as well as countless other fish populations and ocean life around the world.

It just works!

OPR works by replenishing missing vital mineral dust that climate change has prevented from reaching the Alaskan ocean pastures. The immediate result of our replenishment – those pastures will be seen to be restored to historic green health and abundance.

Proof of OPR’s spectacular results is clearly revealed in Alaska Fish & Game data shown to the Senators. The data, published by the state last year, showed the largest catch of salmon in Alaskan history coincided precisely with the OPR large-scale project performed in 2012. The record-breaking catches continued for several years. The value of OPR in Bringing Back The Fish to the state economy was well over $1 billion dollars!

OPR brings back the fish

Testifying to the fact that OPR is safe, sustainable, and good business is seen in the fact that it brings back hundreds of millions of additional fish. But this is not some sort of technological and artificial geoengineering, it follows closely lessons from Nature.

When vital dust arrives in the ocean in the right form, to the right place, at the right time – the ocean plankton pastures bloom and are sustained for months, feeding all of ocean life. Baby salmon when they swim out to sea, instead of mostly starving, are treated to a feast. They grow and grow and before too long, they swim back to their rivers by the millions healthy and strong.

OPR slide 4

The following simple graphic shows how OPR Alaska performs ocean pasture restoration. It just works!

opr slide 5

Many Miracles

There are many miracles of eco-restoration delivered by OPR  as this nature-based technology in the largest ecosystem – the 72% of our blue planet that is our oceans.

    1.  Brings Back The Fish and all of ocean life, plankton, seabirds, seals, whales
    2.  Reduces Ocean Acidification by repurposing deadly CO2 into new life
    3.  Scrubs And Removes deadly mercury from surface oceans
    4.  Restores Plankton Blooms as a source of clouds, rains, and global cooling
    5.  World’s Best Hope to mitigate the lion’s share of anthropogenic CO2

Questions & Answers

The Senator’s asked many questions about OPR during their hearing on the topic. They seemed convinced that getting on with OPR in the Gulf of Alaska is vitally important.

Senator Kiehle stated, “There are questions of whether OPR will really deliver the results presented”  and “he was eager to see what the data (from the 3-yr proposed project) would reveal.”

Chair of the committee, Senator Revak, stated “OPR sounded almost too good to be true”, but he followed up by asking in a hopeful tone,  “Is there a chance OPR Alaska could begin its work as soon as this summer?”

OPR founder Russ George replied to Chairman Revak,  “We hope so, but timing is tight”. He further noted, “If we were to get out to sea this summer, Alaskan’s can expect to catch hundreds of millions of additional salmon next year.”

Will OPR work for other fish, how about for Atlantic Salmon on the East coast of the USA.

The answer is most certainly yes. Here’s a link to begin some reading on OPR for Atlantic Salmon. https://russgeorge.net/?s=atlantic+salmon&submit=Search 

PDF of our Alaska Senate slides OPR Alaaka_Senate_short_pitch_deck_05Mar_rg1